The Dutch Realtor association NVM came out with their quarterly report on the housing market in The Netherlands this week. For the first time since the third quarter of 2013 the price of the average sold house in Amsterdam declined year over year.
Furthermore the average price per square meter (m2) is declining from last quarter. No year over year decline here yet. It will be interesting to watch to see if the trend continues.
The average time a house sits on the market has also been going up to an average of 31 days.
I made a post before how an inversion of the yield curve has preceded the last 8 recessions in the US. Recently, I came across this interesting chart on Twitter which shows the yield curve spread for US treasuries with a maturity of 3 month and 10 year from the last 100 years.
This chart shows that yield curve inversions didn’t happen between the 1930’s and 1960’s before a recession happend.
Currently the US 3 month – 10 year yield curve is inverted.
Purchasing Managers’ Indexes (PMI) are economic indicators derived from monthly surveys of private sector companies. Today the latest PMI Manufacturing Index for the US (The ISM Manufacturing Index) came out which was the most negative reading in the last decade.
Global manufacturing PMI’s are rising again though after a record streak of 15 negative months of declines. The last time this index went positive after a long streak of negative PMI’s it was 2009 and that turned out to to be the bottom and a great moment to buy stocks.
The above index has coincided quite nicely with the Bloomberg World Stock Market Cap index which hit a high in January 2018. The index still hasn’t recovered since then.
An inverted yield curve is one of the few indicators that before have always correctly signalled an upcoming recession. An inverted yield curve happens when the yield on 10 year treasuries is below the yield on 2 year treasuries (sometimes called the “2s10s”). The 2-10 year yield curve is the most common people view. Currently the 2-10 year yield curve is positive after it turned negative for the first time since 2007 at the end of August.
In the past a negative yield curve has always signalled that a recession could happen in the next 1 to 2 years. Note from the chart below that the curve can be at or below zero for a long period before a recession happens. Furthermore from the chart it looks like a rapidly steeping yield curve signals a recession is close.
The question arises will an inverted yield curve signal a recession this time? A big difference in my opinion with other times is that this time the yield curve is watched by a lot of participants in the market and so a lot of stories are published about it.
From the mainstream media such as Drudge Report.
To the president of The United States who even talks about a “crazy” inverted yield curve.
And even members of the Federal Reserve such as Atlanta Federal Reserve President Bostic (picture below) and Neel Kashkari (in a post on Medium here) the President of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve are openly talking about the inversion of the yield curve and what it means for the economy.
It remains to be seen whether the signal works this time.
Since 1988 stocks have always produced a negative 10 year return when the Forward Price to Earnings ratio was 22 or higher. This chart says nothing about 1 year returns. Then returns are all over the place whether the Forward P/E is 12 or 22. Although you can see from the chart that positive returns are lower 1 year out compared to when the Forward P/E is lower.
This data is for the US and I have no idea what these charts would look like if you would take an index like the Nikkei 225 or a European index such as the Euro Stoxx 50 or the AEX Index.
If you invest on a long term basis the lower the Forward P/E for the market the better your return could be.
As of the end of June 2019, the Forward P/E for the S&P 500 is 16.9. This was above the average of the last 30 years. This average is skewed to the upside though because of the extreme valuations during the 2000’s Dot-com bubble in stocks.
The Dutch Statistics Bureau CBS came out last week with a new monthly update on Dutch house prices. The data is showing that the speed at of which house prices in The Netherlands are rising is slowly declining.
Meanwhile the Dutch government has come out in the past few weeks with changes to the taxing of property investments in box 3 (investment properties will be taxed higher) and it has proposed a new law which will limit the amount of the WOZ-waarde (the value of a home used for taxation purposes) to be used as points to calculate whether a house will be classified for rent control or not. These two changes could potentially have a big impact on the prices of Dutch homes.
At this moment Dutch house prices were 5,7% higher in August 2019 than a year before. This is down from the 9,5% year over year growth of prices in November 2018.
The average sales price of Dutch home has risen to a price of € 316,000. At the bottom in June 2013 the average sales price of house in The Netherlands was € 206.000. From the bottom in 2013 prices have risen a total of 53%.
The rise in prices has led to a decline in houses that are sold per month. As can be seen in the two below charts the amount of houses that are sold each month has been declining. This is also partly caused by a shortage of houses in the Netherlands.
At this moment the value of all houses sold in the Netherlands is not showing any signs of weakness but a drop can happen suddenly as the below chart shows.
The Japanese stock market was booming at the end of the 1980’s. The Nikkei reached a high of 40,000.
Because of this boom, Japanese companies were among the most expensive companies in the world. This led to a lot of Japanese companies buying up foreign companies. Newsweek came out with this cover in 1987 capturing the zeitgeist of that time. This zeitgeist was later also captured in the movie Die Hard (the company at the center of the movie being Japanese).
Ultimately the bubble burst and Japanese stocks entered a bear market. Stocks crashed almost 90% from the top and the Nikkei reached a bear market low in 2009 during the credit crisis. Japanese stocks are up 350% since then but still almost 50% below the all time high set almost 30 years ago. Japanese stocks to this day have not yet recovered.
One other way that shows how big this bubble was is how large the market capitalisation of Japanese stocks was as a percentage of global stock market capitalisation.
Berkshire Hathaway and Apple are currently the second and fifth company in the S&P 500 by weighting in the index. The market capitalisation for these companies are currently $ 980 billion for Apple and $525 for Berkshire Hathaway.
At this moment Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway holds a $ 50 billion stake in Apple. This position is 5% of the market capitalisation of Apple and more interestingly 10% of the market capitalisation of Berkshire Hathaway. The stake in Apple is 25% of Berkshire’s equity portfolio. Meanwhile Berkshire’s has hit the enormous amount of $ 122 billion in cash.
Berkshire’s performance over the years has been stunning, as I’ve posted before. In euro’s though, the performance is even more stunning the last decade since the effect of the dollar gaining in value has added to performance.
The balance sheet of the Federal Reserve has been big in the past as can be seen in the below chart. This chart depicts the balance sheet to GDP ratio of the Federal Reserve from 1913 till 2012. The Federal Reserve was created in the year 1913.
After the crash of 1929 the balance sheet had to be increased in order to save the economy. The balance sheet to GDP ratio hit a high of 23% right at the start of World War II. Since then it had slowly trended lower to 5% of GDP until the financial crisis of 2008 hit.
Here is a chart which has the balance sheet since today. As can be seen from the chart is that the Fed’s balance sheet started rising after the financial crisis and hit a high of $ 4.4 trillion in 2014 when the Fed ended the QE program. In 2018 the Fed chose to unwind the balance sheet.
Right now the Federal Reserve balance sheet to GDP ratio sits around 18% after having hit a high of 25% in 2014. This is explained by the Fed unwinding the balance sheet from 2018 and the rise in US GDP.
A fascinating chart I came across on Twitter. Since the financial crisis around $ 3 trillion has been flowing in to passive index funds which typically have a lower fee than active funds. But what is interesting about this is that there have been no net inflows in US stocks since the financial crisis.
All the money that has flowed into passive index funds have been offset by an outflow of actively managed funds. In fact, there is actually $350 billion less in US equity funds (both active and passive) than before the financial crisis.
At the same time the S&P 500 is up 300%. Even more when dividends are factored in.
So why then are stocks higher if demand from investors in funds actually down $ 350 billion over the last decade?
The answer could be because of demand for stocks from buybacks. Buybacks have become more popular since the financial crisis. With buybacks a company uses its own money to buy back its own shares in the market. Buybacks are popular because they are a very tax efficient way to generate shareholder value.
When a company performs a stocks buyback program the company buys back their shares on the stock market. This way the amount of outstanding shares is reduced. Remaining shareholders will share their profits with less shareholders. This should lead to an increase in the price of the remaining shares.
If a dividend is paid out a tax must be paid in this received dividend. A capital gains tax only has to be paid when the shares are sold. So during the period which an investor holds his shares no taxes have to be paid (which is different from when a dividend is paid).